🏆 Best for Photo/Hybrid
Sony A7 IV
Choose if: You prioritize lens selection, color science, and versatility. Best for talking-head videos, portraits, and controlled shooting.
Sensor 33MP FF
Video 4K60 (crop)
IBIS 5.5 stops
Burst 10fps
Sony A7 IV vs Canon R6 II
Two flagship hybrids battle for your bag. We compare autofocus, video quality, stabilization, and the ecosystem that matters most.
Updated: January 2026
Quick Verdict
🎬 Best for Action/Video
Canon R6 Mark II
Choose if: You shoot fast action, sports, or gimbal-free handheld video. Best for wedding videographers and run-and-gun creators.
Sensor 24.2MP FF
Video 4K60 Full
IBIS 8 stops
Burst 40fps
Full Specs Comparison
| Specification | Sony A7 IV | Canon R6 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | 33MP Full-Frame BSI CMOS | 24.2MP Full-Frame CMOS |
| Video (Max) | 4K60 (1.5x crop), 4K30 full-width | 4K60 full-width, 4K120 (crop) |
| Rolling Shutter | Noticeable in 4K24/30 | Minimal (much improved) |
| Autofocus | 759-point hybrid, Eye/Animal/Bird AF | 1053-point Dual Pixel II, Eye/Animal/Vehicle AF |
| IBIS | 5.5 stops (Active mode with crop) | 8 stops (class-leading) |
| Burst Speed | 10fps mechanical | 12fps mechanical, 40fps electronic |
| Card Slots | 1x CFexpress A/SD + 1x SD | 2x SD UHS-II |
| Viewfinder | 3.69M-dot, 0.78x magnification | 3.69M-dot, 0.76x magnification |
| Screen | 3" vari-angle, 1.03M-dot | 3" vari-angle, 1.62M-dot |
| Battery Life | ~580 shots (LCD) | ~760 shots (LCD) |
| Weight | 658g (body only) | 670g (body only) |
| Price (Body) | ~$2,498 / €2,299 | ~$2,499 / €2,699 |
Autofocus: Head-to-Head
Both cameras offer class-leading autofocus, but with different strengths:
Sony A7 IV
- ✅ Better subject variety (birds, insects, vehicles)
- ✅ More AF customization options
- ✅ Excellent in low light
- ⚠️ Slightly slower initial acquisition
Canon R6 II
- ✅ Stickier human/animal tracking
- ✅ Faster initial lock-on
- ✅ Vehicle detection (motorsports)
- ⚠️ Fewer subject types than Sony
Winner: Tie. Choose Canon for human subjects, Sony for wildlife diversity.
Video Quality: The Real Difference
This is where the R6 II pulls ahead for serious video work:
Sony A7 IV
- 4K30: Sharp, full-width, good color
- 4K60: 1.5x crop (APS-C mode)
- ⚠️ Rolling shutter visible in pans
- 10-bit 4:2:2 internal
Canon R6 II
- 4K60: Full-width, oversampled, sharp
- 4K120: With crop for slo-mo
- ✅ Minimal rolling shutter
- 10-bit 4:2:2 C-Log3
Winner: Canon R6 II for video-first creators. The rolling shutter advantage is significant.
Stabilization (IBIS)
Canon's 8-stop IBIS is noticeably better for handheld shooting:
- R6 II: Smooth handheld walking shots possible without gimbal
- A7 IV: Good, but Active mode adds a crop; less effective for motion
Winner: Canon R6 II. Gimbal-free vlogging is more practical.
Lens Ecosystem
This is Sony's biggest advantage:
Sony E-Mount
- ✅ 100+ native lenses
- ✅ Cheap third-party (Sigma, Tamron, Samyang)
- ✅ Budget options at every focal length
Canon RF-Mount
- ⚠️ ~50 native lenses
- ⚠️ No third-party AF lenses (yet)
- ⚠️ Premium pricing on RF glass
Winner: Sony A7 IV. Long-term lens investment is significantly cheaper.
Our Scores
Who Should Buy What?
📸 Choose Sony A7 IV if you...
- Shoot more photos than video
- Want affordable third-party lenses
- Film interviews, podcasts, or controlled scenes
- Need higher resolution for cropping/printing
- Prefer a mature lens ecosystem
🎥 Choose Canon R6 II if you...
- Shoot sports, weddings, or fast action
- Need gimbal-free handheld video
- Film run-and-gun style content
- Require 4K60 without crop
- Can invest in RF lens ecosystem
Bottom Line
For most hybrid creators: The Sony A7 IV offers better long-term value thanks to its lens ecosystem and versatility.
For video-first shooters: The Canon R6 II wins with superior motion handling, IBIS, and 4K60 quality.
Both are excellent cameras. The "wrong" choice still produces pro-quality results.
Affiliate Disclosure
This page contains affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support our independent testing.
Written by cameraupick Editorial Team
Our team of professional photographers and videographers has 10+ years of experience testing cameras. We buy our own gear and provide honest, unbiased reviews.
Learn more about our testing process →